This one sentence has caused more trouble than it’s prevented.
I propose that it be repealed.
This one sentence has caused more trouble than it’s prevented.
I propose that it be repealed.
A few posts ago I tried to get a discussion going about guns and gun control, which started but then sputtered to a stop after a few desultory comments. It was suggested by one devil’s advocate (*cough* Philly *cough*) that perhaps guns in the hands of responsible citizens protecting their homes from invasion was a counter-argument to my implied disdain for guns (my implication most obvious in the graphic of Rick Santorum holding a gun. I just don’t think frothy fecal matter and guns mix well). I tend to agree, to a point, but I don’t necessarily feel that ends the discussion.
I thought it would be interesting to juxtapose a couple of recent news articles, and see if it sparks a discussion:
1. This one (and I won’t point out the 6th line of the article)
and
2. This one.
and
3. This one. (ignore the part about the lack of “any kind of formal firearms training” if you can.)