If you’re seriously thinking that Santorum is a viable candidate, you need to have your chucklehead examined. This guy is a major financial backer of the candidate, yet his ideas about women are from the 1950s. Birth control consisted of women keeping they legs pressed tight against a Bayer aspirin? How enlightened of him! Of course, the Pill had not been invented and commercially produced by then, so I guess that was the only pill available for birth control when Mr. Chucklehead was playing hide the salami.
But good golly, gosh, there are millions of jobs at stake, and terrorists setting up camps in South America! And everybody is talking about sex!
So why does his candidate premise a substantial part of his campaign on sex? He’s against contraception; gay marriage; gay sex for that matter – he thought Lawrence v. Texas was decided wrongly; abortion; and if someone asked him, I suspect he’d have a negative position on masturbation. He is an outspoken opponent of abortion, even to save the life of the mother, yet he had no problem when his wife’s life was in danger during a problem pregnancy, and chose to prematurely end the pregnancy, knowing the child would quickly die (which it did) in order to save her life. In other words, a de facto abortion is OK for him, but no one else!
And he has no problem with chuckleheads like Mr. Friess giving Andrea Mitchell whiplash reacting to his ignorance.
Well, at least there is a video out there where Santorum makes some sense. Hope it provides a chuckle.